Freedom
“Let me warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party...It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles animosity of one part against another.”
In celebration of the 4th of July, let's take pause to consider some of our history and the nature of freedom. Freedom has come to have a connotation of me, my team, my views, and my company getting our way, winning, crushing the opposition, getting a million 'likes', getting elected, etc. There is a long running history of this warped and pathological perspective of freedom.
George
Washington's prophetic words hold true to this day, they are a
commentary on the enslavement of polarity and the limits that we
place upon ourselves in the name of freedom. Real freedom is a
solidarity of mind, body, spirit and community. In the Buddhist
tradition happiness and freedom are independent of circumstances and
perspective, freedom and fulfillment lay in the recognition of
oneness and a skillful response to the present moment...chop wood,
carry water, when hungry eat, when tired sleep.
The
election of 1800 was a turning point in American history and set the
stage for political
parties and ideology to become the contentious, self-interested
polarities that they are today. In republican ideology, political
parties were dangerous and undesirable, and by their very nature they
purposely promoted discord. This is because a party, or any party
line by a group is self-interested at the expense of the greater
good, it does not bode well with opposition, critique, and questioning. By necessity the party must incite rancor and discord to rally
their supporters.
In
1800 the election between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson represented
a level of enmity that makes modern mudslinging mild in comparison.
The Federalists, which Adams represented, believed in a strong
centralized federal government: Republicans, represented by
Jefferson, argued that such a government endangerd republican
liberty. They both are right! But according to the rules of party
politics, you can't both be right, and you must
have an enemy. Talk
about a danger to democratic freedom!
One
of the many sychronicities of the very frail beginning of our
republic and what's happening today is that
Adams signed into law
the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien Act raised the residency
requirement for immigrants to become citizens from 5 to 14 years, and
empowered the president to expel aliens deemed dangerous (think
President Trump).
The sedition
act empowered the government to fine or imprison anyone who opposed
“any measures of
the government, aided any insurrection, riot, unlawful assemble, or
combination and wrote, printed, uttered or published...any false,
scandalous, and malicious writing”
that disparaged the government (think
Julian
Assange).
All violent revolutions eventuate in civil war; America, France, Russia, to name a view. This is because the pendulum of polarity will always swing the other way, due to the force of social gravity. What is demonized today will become popular down the road, what is considered oppressive in one faction will be the very essence of liberty in another, in the 60's Ram Dass wrote "Hippies create police, police create hippies."
All violent revolutions eventuate in civil war; America, France, Russia, to name a view. This is because the pendulum of polarity will always swing the other way, due to the force of social gravity. What is demonized today will become popular down the road, what is considered oppressive in one faction will be the very essence of liberty in another, in the 60's Ram Dass wrote "Hippies create police, police create hippies."
The
liberties and freedoms we are privileged to engage and express in our
country should be embraced and skillfully used for the greatest good.
The diversity that exists in opposition to any particular view is a
good thing, and our freedom is not dependent on rallying a campaign of
hate (even if what we're campaigning against is hate). There is a
dialectical process that brings truth to the surface if it is engaged
without attachment to the outcome, this is the nature of a democratic
dialogue. Trying to understand first before you are understood is the
hallmark of compassion and enlightenment. This is all a tall order to
live and practice, but I believe it is the true cost of freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment